It is currently Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:29 am

Tell a friend!

 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
electronic and phonon relaxation time versus doping
Author Message

Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 5:18 pm
Posts: 64
University: Rondonia university
electronic and phonon relaxation time versus doping
Dear all,

I am trying to compute transport properties for some materials (Seebeck, electronic conductivity, thermal lattice conductivity, etc). The code I am using allows to compute these properties for different electron/hole concentrations. However I have been setting the electronic lifetime ($\tau_{el}) (that I obtain from EPW) to be the same for all concentrations. I have realized that we can redefine the Fermi energy using EPW. My question is : To what extent keeping the electronic lifetime constant is correct? Can EPW recalculate$\tau_{el}$for different electronic concentrations (after redefining the Fermi energy)? Regards Elie Moujaes Federal university of Rondonia Brazil _________________ Physics Department university of Rondonia Brazil Porto Velho- Rondonia Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:08 pm Site Admin Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:25 pm Posts: 576 University: Oxford Re: electronic and phonon relaxation time versus doping Dear eliephys78, The scattering rate does depend on band fractional occupation. You can approximate by keeping the lifetime constant and this should be ok for very low doping/intrinsic doping. Note that large doping will have many effects, including changing the bandstructure (polaron etc). The best in my opinion is to test it for your own system in the condition you are interested in and determine whether is is important or not. _________________ Dr. Samuel PoncĂ© Department of Materials University of Oxford Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PH, UK Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:09 pm Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 5:18 pm Posts: 64 University: Rondonia university Re: electronic and phonon relaxation time versus doping Thank you for your answer, I just got two more small questions: 1- What I am doing in my calculations is that I am calculating the average of$\tau_{n,k}\$ over all bands and and all points for say the 11 Wannier functions I considered and using it in subsequent transport calculations. Is this correct or do I have to separate relaxation times for holes and electrons? if so,

2-How to calculate the hole and electron relaxation times separately? Do I consider the average of \tau over all conduction bands for electron relaxation time and all over all valence bands for the hole relaxation time or do i have to ONLY consider the maximum valence band for holes and minimum conduction band for electrons?

Thanks again

_________________
Physics Department
university of Rondonia Brazil
Porto Velho- Rondonia

Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:12 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by
 Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ]

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ General discussion Theory    Electron-phonon    Superconductivity Compilation Running the code